Relevance Rules

March 22, 2010

Should you ‘reduce, reuse and recycle’?  From a reputation perspective, if not an eco-perspective, the answer, in my opinion, is yes.

You might think people may have had enough of whatever it is you provide, but what’s more important is not that that they’ve tried, or heard, it before, but that it remains relevant to them.

For us as service providers, too, the temptation to develop or provide ‘new’ stuff can be extremely tempting. We think clients and customers may tire of our offerings and want something that’s ‘new’ and ‘improved’.

And we may grow tired ourselves of offering the same things day in and day out. However, clients don’t necessarily want ‘new’ stuff. What they want is relevant stuff.

As a product or service provider, your job is to remind your clients and customers just how relevant whatever it is you provide continues to be them. The core of your key messages probably won’t change. Nor will the benefits, or uses, of whatever you provide. What will change is how you frame your offering to make it relevant to them right now.

So if you’re trying to think up ‘new’ ways of doing things, think too about how you can re-frame, re-package and re-communicate what you already provide so that it remains relevant and valuable to your clients and customers. It’s a reputation-winning strategy.

Whatever you offer may need tweaking, but it probably won’t need abandoning altogether.

Think creatively and remind yourself, and your clients, of what’s great about your offering by linking it to current trends and positioning it as a ‘must have now’. After all, an anagram of ‘Relevance Rules’ is ‘Revenues Recall’.

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.